Papers with distractor generation
D-GEN: Automatic Distractor Generation and Evaluation for Reliable Assessment of Generative Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating generative models with open-ended generation rely on predefined distractors and are costly and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a ranking alignment and entropy analysis to evaluate distractors' quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model preserves ranking consistency and matches the entropy distribution of ground-truth distractors. |
Automatic Distractor Generation for Multiple Choice Questions in Standard Tests (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to generate distractors for multiple choice questions are expensive and time-consuming. |
| Approach: | They propose a question and answer guided distractor generation framework to automate distractors generated by domain experts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models and achieves state-of-the-art on a large-scale dataset. |
ZmBART: An Unsupervised Cross-lingual Transfer Framework for Language Generation (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in NLP focus on large annotated training data. |
| Approach: | They propose an unsupervised framework that does not use parallel or pseudo-parallel/back-translated data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework does not use parallel or pseudo-parallel/back-translated data. |
A BERT-based Distractor Generation Scheme with Multi-tasking and Negative Answer Training Strategies. (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing distractor generation methods are far from practical, and there are still room for improvement. |
| Approach: | They propose a distractor generation scheme with multi-tasking and negative answer training strategies for generating multiple distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme improves the state-of-the-art results from 28.65 to 39.81 (BLEU 1 score) and generates multiple distractors shows strong distracting power for multiple choice questions. |
Chain-of-Exemplar: Enhancing Distractor Generation for Multimodal Educational Question Generation (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for multiple choice questions focus on text inputs and lack visual information. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to generate subject-specific educational questions with plausible distractors based on multimodal content. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves question generation and distractor generation over existing methods across subjects and educational levels. |
Distractor Generation Using Generative and Discriminative Capabilities of Transformer-based Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are used to test language learners' comprehension and knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose an automatic distractor generation approach which generates correct and incorrect answer options and then discriminates potential correct options from distractors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms previous models on multiple choice questions and reading comprehension questions. |
DisGeM: Distractor Generation for Multiple Choice Questions with Span Masking (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice cloze tests are a prevalent form of assessment that evaluates students' comprehension and inference abilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for distractor generation using readily available pre-trained language models . human evaluations confirm that their approach produces more effective distractors . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods without training or fine-tuning human evaluations confirm it. |
Enhancing Distractor Generation for Multiple-Choice Questions with Retrieval Augmented Pretraining and Knowledge Graph Integration (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Han Cheng Yu, Yu An Shih, Kin Man Law, KaiYu Hsieh, Yu Chen Cheng, Hsin Chih Ho, Zih An Lin, Wen-Chuan Hsu, Yao-Chung Fan
| Challenge: | Existing LMs undergo task-agnostic pertaining, but task-specific pretraining has gained prominence. |
| Approach: | They propose retrieval augmented pretraining and task-specific pretraining for DG . they propose to refine language model pretraining to align it more closely with downstream task . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance of multiple-choice questions by integrating knowledge graphs and language models. |
Distractor Generation based on Text2Text Language Models with Pseudo Kullback-Leibler Divergence Regulation (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Hui-Juan Wang, Kai-Yu Hsieh, Han-Cheng Yu, Jui-Ching Tsou, Yu An Shih, Chen-Hua Huang, Yao-Chung Fan
| Challenge: | Existing methods for cloze-style multiple choice questions (MCQs) distractor generation are based on knowledge bases and pre-trained language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to formulate cloze distractor generation task as Text2Text task and propose a pseudo Kullback-Leibler divergence for regulating the generation to consider item discrimination index in education evaluation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves state-of-the-art performance from 10.81 to 22.00 (p@1 score) |
BRAINTEASER: Lateral Thinking Puzzles for Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | lateral thinking tasks require implicit and complex reasoning, relying on human-like commonsense mechanisms. |
| Approach: | They propose a lateral thinking benchmark to test models' ability to exhibit lateral reasoning and defy default commonsense associations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exhibits lateral thinking and defies default commonsense associations. |
Generating Plausible Distractors for Multiple-Choice Questions via Student Choice Prediction (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are critical for identifying misconceptions and gaps in knowledge and accurately assessing students' understanding. |
| Approach: | They propose to train a model to generate distractors that are more likely to be selected by students by a pairwise ranker and a distractor generator via Direct Preference Optimization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models and performs comparable to humans in various metrics including pairwise rank accuracy and distractor plausibility. |